Siegel v. Rader

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the “characteristics” of the substance, including its “appearance, smell, and packaging,” indicated that the defendant believed the substance was marijuana
• reasoning that the “smell, and packaging of the substance, and appellant’s eagerness to discard it, amply supported the court’s conclusion that he believed the green weed-like material to be marijuana”
• ―This is not a case where the trier of fact crossed the bounds of permissible inference and entered the forbidden territory of conjecture or speculation.‖

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).