Siegel v. Diehl Pump & Supply Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “maritime law does not support a stand-alone claim based on a cruise line’s alleged duty to take actions to reduce or eliminate foreseeable risks before they manifest, where such claim is unconnected to [the passenger’s] specific accident”
• summary judgment was appropriate where plaintiff “provided no evidence at all of any accidents of the sort he experienced in the location he experienced it (or any similar location)” and “[c]onstructive notice cannot be based on mere theory”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).