Skip to main content
· 5/23/1956

Siebrand v. Gossnell

Citations

  • 234 F.2d 81

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that leave 26 to amend need not be granted if it would be “a futile exercise”
  • finding 4 leave to amend need not be granted when amendment would be 5 futile
  • finding 27 leave to amend need not be granted when amendment would be 28 futile
  • affirming denial of leave to amend where 16 the district court “carefully considered and incorporated into its analysis any facts offered 17 by plaintiffs, even those beyond the complaint.”
  • finding leave to amend need not be granted when amendment 11 would be futile
  • finding leave to amend need not be granted when 17 amendment would be futile

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.