Sieber v. Weiden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that in the context of recreational user immunity, R.C. 1533.18(A) defines “premises” as “all privately owned lands, ways, waters, and any buildings and structures thereon * * *”
• “The analysis should focus on the character of the property upon which the injury occurs and the type of activities for which the property is held open to the public.”
• plaintiff was owed no duty of care when he was injured while playing baseball on a baseball field in a public park
• “the inquiry should focus on the nature and scope of activity for which the premises are held open to the public”
• the essential character of the property should fit within the intent of the statute
• the essential character of the property should fit within the intent of the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).