· 5/20/1994
Sidney S. Arst Co. v. Pipefitters Welfare Educ. Fund, Defendant-Third/party v. Michael Rand Arst and Donald Takacs, Third/party
Citations
- 25 F.3d 417
- 24 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20976
- 38 ERC (BNA) 1756
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 11861
- 1994 WL 198003
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \The complaint need not support a viable claim only under the particular legal theory intended by the plaintiff.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Cudahy, Rovner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.