Sides v. Contemporary Homes, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• when defendant claimed that plaintiff was not damaged by the contract breach because it had other jobs, the court held that “such subsequent gains were not the result of the defendant's breach and do not inure to the benefit of the defendant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).