Skip to main content
· 6/22/2010

Sides v. Cherry

Citations

  • 609 F.3d 576
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 12771
  • 2010 WL 2488877

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that due-process concerns are “weightier” in the criminal context than in the civil context
  • holding no abuse of discretion where the court “adopted the Deputy Marshal’s advice” but “nonetheless acknowledged that the Marshal’s view was only a recommendation and that the Court could have the shackles removed” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ambro, Garth, Roth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.