Skip to main content
· 3/9/1989

Sidell T. PIRUS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of HHS, Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 869 F.2d 536
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2804
  • 1989 WL 19350

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Pirus’ attorneys were experts in Social Security law and uniquely situated to handle the claim due to recent experience litigating a similar case
  • finding that knowledge of a complex statutory scheme such as social security laws may qualify as distinctive knowledge or skills
  • requiring expertise with a complex statutory scheme and the service of a particular class of clients
  • approving enhanced fees for attorneys who had devoted themselves to acquiring \familiarity and expertise\ with a specific, complex portion of the Social Security Act
  • requiring expertise with a complex statutory scheme and the service of a particular class of clients
  • approving enhanced fees for attorneys who had devoted themselves to acquiring “familiarity and expertise” with a specific, complex portion of the Social Security Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alarcon, Ferguson, Norris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.