Siddarth Shah and Daksha Shah, Plaintiffs-Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Racetrac Petroleum Co., Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “[b]reach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is not an independent basis for relief” under Tennessee law
• \Breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is not an independent basis for relief.\
• “Despite a few outliers, federal courts considering fraudulent concealment under Tennessee law have made clear that Domestic Sewing is the governing law.”
• “If the relationship between [the parties] qualifies as a ’franchise relationship’ under the terms of the [statute] ... how the parties describe their relationship is irrelevant.”
• “[I]f the claim is based on promissory fraud, then the misrepresentation must ‘embody a promise of future action without the present intention to carry out the promise.’” (quoting Stacks v. Saunders, 812 S.W.2d 587, 592 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1990)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).