· 11/15/1996
Sid Richardson Carbon & Gasoline Co. v. Interenergy Resources, Ltd.
Citations
- 99 F.3d 746
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 29628
- 1996 WL 630713
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding claim preclusion did not apply because the latter claim' did not accrue until after the first proceeding concluded
- reasoning that declaratory relief is a procedural device and does not establish any substantive rights or causes of action
- reasoning that declaratory relief is a procedural device and does not establish any substantive rights or causes of action
- holding Texas Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act is merely procedural device which does not create any substantive rights or causes of action
- reasoning that declaratory relief is a procedural device and does not establish any substantive rights or causes of action
- holding Texas Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act is merely procedural device which does not create any substantive rights or causes of action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Parker, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.