Skip to main content
· 11/15/1996

Sid Richardson Carbon & Gasoline Co. v. Interenergy Resources, Ltd.

Citations

  • 99 F.3d 746
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 29628
  • 1996 WL 630713

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding claim preclusion did not apply because the latter claim' did not accrue until after the first proceeding concluded
  • reasoning that declaratory relief is a procedural device and does not establish any substantive rights or causes of action
  • reasoning that declaratory relief is a procedural device and does not establish any substantive rights or causes of action
  • holding Texas Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act is merely procedural device which does not create any substantive rights or causes of action
  • reasoning that declaratory relief is a procedural device and does not establish any substantive rights or causes of action
  • holding Texas Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act is merely procedural device which does not create any substantive rights or causes of action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parker, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.