Sichuan Changhong Elec. Co., Ltd. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in order to succeed on a due process claim the party had to show that its opportunity to be heard was “unreasonably curtailed”
• remanding for the Commission to reexamine its determination in light of Bratsk
• holding a four-day comment period not unreasonable
• due process claim did not succeed when the agency complied with its statutory and regulatory obligations, which otherwise constituted “a reasonable means to bring an administrative procedure to closure”
• upholding a four-day comment period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).