Skip to main content
· 11/20/2002

Sibersky v. Borah, Goldstein, Altschuler & Schwartz, P.C.

Citations

  • 242 F. Supp. 2d 273
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22381
  • 2002 WL 31525647

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding case not moot because defendant “fails to provide plaintiff with all to which he would be entitled”
  • explaining that, even though defendants offered plaintiff full statutory damages, attorney's fees, costs, and additional $500 to settle FDCPA claim, the court could not, on the basis of a Rule 12(b)(1) motion, determine the existence or amount of actual damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koeltl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.