Skip to main content
· 3/24/2022

Siamak Tavakoli v. Fort Bend County MUD 50

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing moot civil commitment order to mental health facility pursuant to G. L. c. 123, §§ 7 and 8
  • dismissing appeal as moot, but concluding that first continuance request \is mandatory where a denial thereof is reasonably likely to prejudice [a patient's] ability to prepare a meaningful defense\
  • dismissing appeal as moot, but concluding that first continuance request \is mandatory where a denial thereof is reasonably likely to prejudice [a patient's] ability to prepare a meaningful defense\
  • \The infringement of a person's liberty interest resulting from involuntary commitment for six months is massive\ [quotation omitted]
  • recent legislative reforms to G. L. c. 123 intended \to afford individuals more due process in civil commitment and medical treatment hearings than had been available previously\ [citation omitted]
  • \It is illogical that the Legislature would shorten the period for conducting [civil commitment and medical treatment] hearings and have it inure to the detriment of the individual's due process right to prepare a meaningful defense\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.