Shweta Kohli v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that discrepancies between petitioner’s testimony, declaration, and letter of membership substantially supported an adverse credibility finding
• holding that a defective NTA did not violate due process where no prejudice was shown
• concluding that discrepancies between petitioner’s testimony, declaration, and letter of membership substantially supported an adverse credibility finding
• holding that an IJ’s denial of a motion to terminate proceedings due to a defective NTA did not violate due process because no prejudice was shown
• concluding that illegible name and title of issuing officer on Notice to Appear was not a violation of any statute or regulation and did not prejudice alien or deprive immigration court of jurisdiction
• noting that persecution “is an extreme concept that does not include every sort of treatment our society regards as offensive” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).