· 10/13/2010
Shurick v. Boeing Co.
Citations
- 623 F.3d 1114
- 31 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 489
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 21067
- 2010 WL 3983161
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The doctrine of claim preclusion (or res judicata) bars the parties to an action from relitigating matters that were or could have been litigated in an earlier suit.”
- “The doctrine of claim preclusion (or res judicata) bars the parties to an action from relitigating matters that were or could have been litigated in an earlier suit.”
- “[C]laim preclusion operates to prevent parties from contesting matters that they have had a full and fair opportunity to litigate between themselves . . . .” (quotation marks omitted)
- “[d]ismissal by the court sua sponte on res judicata grounds . . . is permissible in the interest of judicial economy where both actions were brought before the same court.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carnes, Marcus, Krayitch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.