Skip to main content
· 10/13/2010

Shurick v. Boeing Co.

Citations

  • 623 F.3d 1114
  • 31 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 489
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 21067
  • 2010 WL 3983161

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The doctrine of claim preclusion (or res judicata) bars the parties to an action from relitigating matters that were or could have been litigated in an earlier suit.”
  • “The doctrine of claim preclusion (or res judicata) bars the parties to an action from relitigating matters that were or could have been litigated in an earlier suit.”
  • “[C]laim preclusion operates to prevent parties from contesting matters that they have had a full and fair opportunity to litigate between themselves . . . .” (quotation marks omitted)
  • “[d]ismissal by the court sua sponte on res judicata grounds . . . is permissible in the interest of judicial economy where both actions were brought before the same court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carnes, Marcus, Krayitch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.