Shupe v. Lingafelter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that omission of instruction was harmless because jury’s answer to submitted question negated unsubmitted issue
• holding that a trial court does not err when refusing to submit particular jury instructions unless it abuses its discretion
• holding that omission of negligent-entrustment issue was harmless in light of jury = s refusal to find that driver = s negligence proximately caused accident
• holding that a trial court does not err when refusing to submit particular jury instructions unless it abuses its discretion
• holding that a trial court does not err when refusing to submit particular jury instructions unless it abuses its discretion
• holding harmless any error in submission of negligent hiring and negligent entrustment claims asserted against two different defendants in single broad-form negligence question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).