Shunaula v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that § 1252(a)(2)(A) and (e) barred review of petition for review of an expedited removal order
• holding that the “jurisdictional bar” of § 242 precludes judicial review of a claim of “illegality in the Attorney General’s particular decision to remove” an alien under the expedited removal statute
• joining “every other Circuit to have considered this matter” in holding that courts lack jurisdiction to review a collateral attack on an expedited removal order
• court lacked jurisdiction to reviev 20 ||challenge to the “way [plaintiff's expedited] removal was carried out”
• addressing due process challenge to § 1252(e)(2) and § 1252(a)(2)(A)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).