Skip to main content
· 5/26/1922

Shun Yuen Hing & Co. v. United States

Citations

  • 11 Ct. Cust. 331
  • 1922 WL 22012
  • 1922 CCPA LEXIS 30

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding a seller was not entitled to an administrative expense claim under § 503(b)(1) because nothing in the record suggested any post-petition actions such as negotiating new, post-petition contracts with the debtor
  • “damage caused by rejection is a prepetition claim, so that it will not burden the reorganizing enterprise”
  • “Where no benefits are received by the bankrupt estate or its representative under the contract, and the contract is not assumed, the creditor’s claim is not entitled to priority[.]”
  • “In other words, even if the debtor rejects long after commencement of the Chapter 11 proceeding, the Bankruptcy Code declares that the damage caused by the rejections is a pre-petition claim, so that it will not burden the reorganizing enterprise.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Agreement, Barber, Counsel, Martin, Smith, Yries

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.