Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1/27/1961
Shumway v. Nelson
Citations
- 259 Minn. 319
- 107 N.W.2d 531
- 1961 Minn. LEXIS 671
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting an assertion that the decedent’s sole beneficiary rather than the trustee was the real party in interest in a wrongful death action
- rejecting an assertion that the decedent's sole beneficiary rather than the trustee was the real party in interest in a wrongful death action
- explaining that an action under § 573.02 “creates an entirely new cause of action for the purpose of compensating the next of kin who have suffered pecuniary loss by reason of the death of the decedent. It is not brought for the benefit of the decedent”
- explaining that an action under § 573.02 “creates an entirely new cause of action for the purpose of compensating the next of kin who have suffered pecuniary loss by reason of the death of the decedent. It is not brought for the benefit of the decedent”
- “This statute creates an entirely new cause of action for the purpose of compensating the next of kin who have suffered pecuniary loss- by reason of the death of the decedent.”
- wrongful death statute “is remedial in character and thus requires a liberal construction.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Klein v. KleinCalifornia Supreme Court· 1962-11-09· cited 125×
- Balts v. BaltsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1966-04-01· cited 105×
- Fussner v. AndertSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1961-12-15· cited 95×
- Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-03-18· cited 94×
- Jassmine D. Adams v. Toyota Motor CorporationEighth Circuit· 2017-08-14· cited 51×
- Ortiz Ex Rel. Ortiz v. GavendaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-03-18· cited 37×
- Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich & Whiteman, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-09-14· cited 24×
- Dahl v. NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL BANK MINNEAPOLISSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1963-04-11· cited 21×
- Heyman v. GordonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1963-05-06· cited 18×
- Prem v. CoxOhio Supreme Court· 1983-01-05· cited 17×
- Asplin v. AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1978-12-05· cited 16×
- Martz v. RevierSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1969-07-18· cited 15×
- Julie M. Steinlage, Trustee for the Heirs of Dolores May Smith v. Mayo Clinic Rochester, a Minnesota CorporationEighth Circuit· 2006-01-30· cited 12×
- Poepping v. LindemannSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1964-04-10· cited 11×
- Brinks v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.W.D. Michigan· 1969-02-04· cited 8×
- Pelowski v. FredericksonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1962-08-03· cited 6×
- Village of Roseville v. Sunset Memorial Park Assn. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1962-03-02· cited 6×
- Calhoun v. EaganCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-08-30· cited 5×
- Tezak v. BachkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2005-06-21· cited 4×
- American National Fire Insurance Co. v. CordieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1991-12-17· cited 4×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Beck v. GroeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1955-05-27· cited 122×
- Brennecke Ex Rel. Brennecke v. KilpatrickSupreme Court of Missouri· 1960-06-13· cited 61×
- Johnson v. Peoples First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1958-11-10· cited 52×
- Strom v. StromSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1906-06-29· cited 49×
- American Automobile Insurance v. MollingSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1953-04-02· cited 46×
- Drake v. DrakeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1920-04-30· cited 36×
- Koenigs v. TravisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1956-03-02· cited 36×
- Bolinger v. St. Paul & Duluth Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1887-02-11· cited 23×
- Judson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1895-12-19· cited 21×
- Albrecht v. PotthoffSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1934-11-23· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.