Skip to main content
· 10/22/1996

Shumate v. Dugan

Citations

  • 934 S.W.2d 589
  • 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1766
  • 1996 WL 612807

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that \estoppels . . . should not be lightly invoked\ and should be \applied with care and caution and only when all elements clearly appear\
  • parties cannot normally avoid an act or deed on the ground that they were ignorant of the law
  • “An oral contract is valid and enforceable, irrespective of the Statute of Frauds when there is proof of partial performance in furtherance of the agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.