Skip to main content
· 5/10/1907

Shumaker v. Security Life & Annuity Co.

Citations

  • 153 F. 332
  • 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 5096

Syllabus

<p>Insurance — Construction of Life Policy — Nonforfeiture Provision.</p> <p>A policy of life insurance provided that on request of the insured the company would advance to him 30 per cent of each premium, which should be a lien on the policy, also that, in case any premium was not paid when due, the same should be charged against the policy as a loan and the policy continued in force, if its loan value should be sufficient as shown by a table of values given therein, but that “these values shall be claimable only in case the full premiums have been paid in cash and there are no loans on the policy.” Held that, where the insured obtained the 30 per cent advance on the payment of each premium, on his subsequent default lie was not entitled to the benefit of the automatic nonforfeiture pro- - vision.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “laws and regulations of the federal government are subject to change by lawful means. No law or regulation is immune to change by lawful means and no person can reasonably assume the contrary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buffington

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.