Shultz v. State of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the continuing torts doctrine, as an exception to a statute of limitations defense, “presents a factual question that would also preclude dismissal of the complaint”
• \[A] claim for breach of fiduciary duty is subject to the four-year statute of limitations for intentional torts.\ (first citing § 95.11(3)(o); and then citing Halkey-Roberts Corp. v. Mackal, 641 So. 2d 445, 447 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).