Skip to main content
· 8/12/1958

Shultz v. Ramey

Citations

  • 328 P.2d 937
  • 64 N.M. 366

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Review is for correction of an erroneous result, rather than merely to approve or disapprove the grounds on which it is based.”
  • appellate courts will not reverse when result will not be changed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lujan, Sadler, Compton, Shilling-Law, McGhee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.