· 8/12/1958
Shultz v. Ramey
Citations
- 328 P.2d 937
- 64 N.M. 366
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Review is for correction of an erroneous result, rather than merely to approve or disapprove the grounds on which it is based.”
- appellate courts will not reverse when result will not be changed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lujan, Sadler, Compton, Shilling-Law, McGhee
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.