· 11/12/1986
Shultz v. Bowen
Citations
- 662 F. Supp. 1074
- 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17838
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that corporation with no property in New Jersey subject to CBT Act because it employed “a regional sales representative in New Jersey” who sold products and held educational sessions for customers
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pollak
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.