Shulsinger v. Maloney
Citations
- 114 La. 846
- 38 So. 581
- 1905 La. LEXIS 551
Syllabus
<p>' PARTNERSHIP — DISSOLUTION—-SETTLEMENT.</p> <p>When two partners in a poolroom business have made 2l monthly settlements and divisions of the net profits on a certain basis, it will require very strong evidence to make good the claim of one of them, set up for the first time after the dissolution of the partnership, and in connection with the settlement for the last month of the existence of the partnership, that the basis of settlement ought to have been different, especially where the alleged discrepancy involves a large sum.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “FECA . . . provides federal employees with an exclusive remedy against the United States for work-related injuries.” (citing 5 U.S.C. § 8116(c)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Provosty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.