Shulman v. Wells

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that the 16 plaintiff never had a legitimate interest in the money fraudulently deposited into 17 his account because “money in a bank account does not constitute ‘chattel’ for 18 purposes of conversion under these circumstances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).