Shull v. Columbus Municipal Separate School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• attorney’s fees awarded against plaintiff where plaintiff acted contrary to controlling precedent established against plaintiff in another case in which same plaintiff was a party
• “[T]he [school] board acted directly contrary to Judge Keady’s holding in Smith. In the opinion of the court, the action of the board was arbitrary and an allowance of [counsel] fees is proper . . . . ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).