Shukria S. Margos v. Alberto R. Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the petitioner failed to exhaust a claim for protection under the CAT because she did not raise the issue in her appeal to the BIA
• deeming claim unexhaust-ed when argument was based on extremely “broad generalities” that lacked explanation either “through text or citation”
• deeming claim unexhausted when argument was based on ex- tremely “broad generalities” that lacked explanation either “through text or citation”
• noting in passing that “[t]he immigration judge took administrative notice of the 16 No. 07-2369 fact that the Hussein regime and its control of Iraq ceased as of April 2003”
• “Ironically, under [ ] Hussein’s iron fist, Assyrian Christians and similar minorities were arguably better off as their dictator did not tolerate factional strife and civil unrest within ‘his’ country (unless it furthered his own ends).”
• “Ironically, under [ ] Hussein’s iron fist, Assyr- ian Christians and similar minorities were arguably better off as their dic- tator did not tolerate factional strife and civil unrest within ‘his’ country (unless it furthered his own ends).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).