Skip to main content

Shuey v. Holmes

Citations

  • 21 Wash. 223
  • 57 P. 818
  • 1899 Wash. LEXIS 265

Syllabus

<p>BANKS-STATUTORY LIABILITY OP STOCKHOLDERS.</p> <p>Under art. 12, § 11, of the constitution, making each stockholder liable for all contracts, debts and engagements “accruing while they remain such stockholders,” one who was not a stockholder in a banking corporation at the time the corporate indebtedness was incurred or created cannot be subjected to the statutory liability of stockholders.</p> <p>EVIDENCE — PRESUMPTION AS TO CORPORATE INDEBTEDNESS.</p> <p>There is no presumption that the indebtedness of a banking corporation was incurred after a stockholder acquired her shares, in view of art. 12, § 11, of the constitution, making each stockholder liable for all contracts, debts and engagements “accruing while they remain such stockholders.”</p> <p>SAME-BURDEN OF PROOF.</p> <p>Nor, in view of the same constitutional provision, is it a matter of defense in an action to enforce the stockholder’s statutory liability in a banking corporation that she acquired her shares after its corporate indebtedness was incurred.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming trial court order prohibiting attorney for bank from testifying as to what opposing party said, as opposing party had consulted same attorney in confidence before filing suit against the bank

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.