· 5/13/1970
Shuemak v. State
Citations
- 258 N.E.2d 158
- 254 Ind. 117
- 1970 Ind. LEXIS 528
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting “it is universally Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 19A-PC-1604 | April 8, 2020 Page 15 of 18 recognized a finger, palm, or bare footprint found in the place where a crime was committed may be sufficient proof of identity”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Arterburn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.