Skip to main content
· 9/26/1883

Shubrick v. Adams

Citations

  • 20 S.C. 49
  • 1883 S.C. LEXIS 125

Syllabus

<p>1. Tlie stay-laws of 1861-1865, did not create a legal disability to sue. State y. Garew, 13 Rich. 506.</p> <p>2. Where a disability intervenes after a right of action has accrued, the currency of the statute of limitations is not arrested, and the same principle applies to a presumption of payment arising from the lapse of time.</p> <p>3. The suspension of the statute of limitations by act of the legislature does not affect the presumption of payment arising from the lapse of time.</p> <p>4. When a presumption of payment commenced to run in February, 1861, it became complete in twenty-years, notwithstanding the stay-laws of 1861-1865, and the suspension thereby of the statute of limitations.</p> <p>5. The death of one of the obligors on a joint and several bond severed the obligation, and payments thereafter made on the bond by the survivor did not prevent the presumption of payment from running in favor of the deceased's estate.</p>

Judges: Iiep, Simpson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.