Skip to main content
· 12/21/2005

Shubert v. Lucent Technologies Inc. (In Re Winstar Communications, Inc.)

Citations

  • 348 B.R. 234
  • 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 2683
  • 2005 WL 4705075

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that earmarking is an affirmative defense that is waived if not raised in the answer
  • stating that preferred method of valuing a company as a going concern is DCF
  • “The earmarking doctrine is not strictly an affirmative defense under Section 547(c

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Joel B. Rosenthal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.