· 12/21/2005
Shubert v. Lucent Technologies Inc. (In Re Winstar Communications, Inc.)
Citations
- 348 B.R. 234
- 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 2683
- 2005 WL 4705075
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that earmarking is an affirmative defense that is waived if not raised in the answer
- stating that preferred method of valuing a company as a going concern is DCF
- “The earmarking doctrine is not strictly an affirmative defense under Section 547(c
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Joel B. Rosenthal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.