Shu Qin Chen v. Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming district court’s determination that appellant was not entitled to fees and finding it significant that “the [d]istrict [c]ourt did not dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction but rather for a procedural defect”
• affirming district court’s determination that appellant was not entitled to costs under section 1447(c) and finding it significant that “the District Court did not dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction but rather for a procedural defect”
• affirming district court’s determination that appellant was not 1 Camp Mason appears to have sought consent after it filed Notice of Removal. (See ECF No. 9 at 5 (“[w]e have now sought the consent for removal.”) (emphasis added)). entitled to costs under section 1447(c

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).