Shropshire v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing bond forfeiture judgment where variance was fatal when evidence established appellant had been indicted for forgery and uttering and passing as true a forged instrument and had been bonded out for theft by false pretext

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hokr v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-01-19· cited 69×
• MacKintosh v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1992-12-10· cited 11×
• Rodriguez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2009-06-10· cited 8×
• Garcia v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2009-04-01· cited 5×
• Garza, G. Rudolph, Jr. v. Texas, the State Of
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2001-06-14· cited 3×
• International Fidelity Insurance Co. v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-02-07· cited 1×
• San Juan Gustamante, Principal And Roland Garcia, Attorney at Law, Surety v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2009-04-01
• Ross Rodriguez, Attorney at Law, Surety v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2009-03-11
• Eddie Trevino, Jr. v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2005-07-14