Skip to main content
· 10/3/2003

Shropshire v. Fred Rappoport Co.

Citations

  • 294 F. Supp. 2d 1085
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22135
  • 2003 WL 22928548

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding venue proper in case turning on contract interpretation because 10 contract was partially negotiated, signed, and substantially performed in the district
  • “Because [the applicability of equitable estoppel] turn[s] on disputed facts, it is improper for the Court, on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion—the purpose of which is [to] test the sufficiency of the pleadings—to resolve this issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.