Skip to main content
· 4/22/1969

Shrobar v. Jensen

Citations

  • 158 Conn. 202
  • 257 A.2d 806
  • 1969 Conn. LEXIS 594

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiffs should have raised claim that defendant's counsel made misrepresentations to the zoning board in a direct appeal from the action of the board
  • notice of an application to reconstruct and improve a filling station was adequate
  • notice that a variance was sought to reconstruct and improve the filling station was sufficient to give notice to the public that the defendants' proposal to replace the existing structures with an entirely new station was to be considered
  • notice that a variance was sought to reconstruct and improve the filling station was sufficient to give notice to the public that the defendants' proposal to replace the existing structures with an entirely new station was to be considered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Alcorn, House, Thim, Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.