Shroades Ex Rel. Shroades v. Henry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that peer review privilege log should contain information regarding document’s “source ahd reason for creation”
• observing that W. Va. R. Civ. P. 26(e) requires “good cause be shown for a protective order,” which consists of “a particular and specific demonstration of fact, as distinguished from stereotyped and eoneluso-ry statements” (internal quotations and citation omitted)
• \[T]he circuit court should have held an in camera examination to determine if the requested documents are privileged[.]\
• “[T]he circuit court should have held an in camera examination to determine if the requested documents are privileged!.]”
• “The peer review privilege -represents a legislative choice between medical staff candor and the plaintiff’s access to evidence.” (footnote omitted)
• “[t]he peer review privilege represents a legislative choice between medical staff candor and the plaintiffs access to evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).