Skip to main content
· 8/6/2002

Shriner v. Sheehan

Citations

  • 773 N.E.2d 833
  • 2002 Ind. App. LEXIS 1207
  • 2002 WL 1797017

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The prejudice element requires that [the defendants] materially altered their position due to [plaintiff’s] delay . . . .”
  • “It is for the parties, not the court, to stipulate a valuation method in a purchase agreement, and we will not rewrite an explicit agreement even if that method does not produce a price for the shares of stock that reflects a business’s true value.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vaidik, Baker, Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.