Shrewsbury Retirement Board v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that, while “evidence that A is consistent with B, does not by itself warrant a finding that A caused B,” it may assist the finder of fact in reaching that result
• “[I]t is for the appeal board to determine the credibility of the evidence and — apart from a misconstruction which amounts to an error of law — its significance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).