Shpargel v. Stage & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiff was not disabled under ADA even though his carpal tunnel syndrome limited his ability to work longer than 8 hours a day
• no ADA disability where CTS simply prevented plaintiff from working more than eight hours a day
• no ADA disability where CTS simply prevented plaintiff from working more than eight hours a day
• “More telling, are the consistent holdings of other circuits that there is no liability against individuals in their individual capacities under Title VII or similar antidiscrimination statutes.” (collecting cases)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).