Showmethemoney Check Cashers, Inc. v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the arbitration agreement lacked mutuality because it provided for a judicial forum for one party while restricting the other party to arbitration
• finding that the arbitration agreement lacked mutuality because it provided for a judicial forum for one party while restricting the other party to arbitration
• finding that the arbitration agreement lacked mutuality because it provided for a judicial forum for one party while restricting the other party to arbitration
• invalidating an arbitration provision requiring customers to submit their disputes to arbitration but allowing check cashing entity to pursue collection against customers in court
• agreement lacked mutuality of obligation where consumer was bound by arbitration in every aspect, yet company could “proceed immediately to court to collect amounts due it”
• agreement lacked mutuality of obligation where consumer was bound by arbitration in every aspect, yet company could \proceed immediately to court to collect amounts due it\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).