Shou Wei Jin v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “remand would be futile” because the petitioner “presented no evidence” that supported his argument under the correct legal standard
• explaining that the standard for withholding of removal is higher than the standard for asylum
• holding, in a case where the petitioner fled China after his partner was forced to have an abortion, that “remand would be futile in this case because Jin presented no evidence that he personally suffered persecution as a result of China’s population control policies”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).