Shou Mei Dai v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, while the bankruptcy court could infer that the debtor’s “glaring omissions” from his schedules were deliberate, a mere finding of recklessness was sufficient cause for conversion (citing Bullock v. BankChampaign, N.A., 569 U.S. 267 (2013)
• discussing debtor’s failure to establish separate subsections of § 1112(b)(2) as “independent reasons” for dismissal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).