Shotkin v. Kennedy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the absurdity canon does \not . . . justify a court in amending the statute or giving it a meaning to which its language is not susceptible merely to avoid what the court believes are inequitable or unwise results\
• explaining the unreasonable results canon does \not . . . justify a court in amending the 5 No. 2020AP307.rgb statute or giving it a meaning to which its language is not susceptible merely to avoid what the court believes are inequitable or unwise results\
• the absurdity canon \does not . . . justify a court in amending the statute or giving it a meaning to which its language is not susceptible merely to avoid what the court believes are inequitable or unwise results\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).