Shortsleeve v. Centurytel of Alabama, LLC (In Re Shortsleeve)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that post-petition FDCPA claims do not invoke a bankruptcy court’s “arising under,” “arising in,” or “related to” jurisdiction
• finding that post-petition FDCPA claims do not invoke a bankruptcy court’s “arising under,” “arising in,” or “related to” jurisdiction
• The debt- or’s claims under the FDCPA arose post-petition and were not property of the estate, with the result that “prosecution of the FDCPA claims, successful or otherwise, could have no effect upon the administration of the bankruptcy estate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).