Short v. Bohle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that questions decided under de novo review may be decided without any deference to the court below
• explaining that questions decided under de novo review may be decided without any deference to the court below
• holding section 17-23-175 “is a valid legislative enactment,” and does not permit improper bolstering
• recognizing the South Carolina Rules of Evidence allow the legislature to enact evidentiary rules so long as such an enactment does not violate the state or federal constitutions
• holding a court must look to the plain meaning of unambiguous statutory language
• explaining “we look to the federal courts’ interpretations” of the Federal Act when interpreting comparable provisions of the Homeland Security Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).