Skip to main content
· 10/23/1969

Short & Paulk Supply Co. v. Dykes

Citations

  • 171 S.E.2d 782
  • 120 Ga. App. 639
  • 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 889

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing “the two essential elements are the existence of an ulterior purpose and an act in the use of the process not proper in the regular prosecution of the proceeding”
  • recognizing “the two essential elements are the existence of an ulterior purpose and an act in the use of the process not proper in the regular prosecution of the proceeding”
  • affidavit of contractor not supported “with facts as to what the claims may have been for, or the amounts thereof or as to the amounts that he may have paid to these people, or who they may have been”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eberhardt, Bell, Deen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.