Shorr Paper Products, Inc. v. Aurora Elevator, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• criticizing the defendant for focusing solely on exculpatory provision of contract to the exclusion of its specifically articulated obligations, noting that such an interpretation would render defendant’s contractual duties illusory
• criticizing the defendant for focusing solely on exculpatory provision of contract to the exclusion of its specifically articulated obligations, noting that such an interpretation would render defendant’s contractual duties illusory
• criticizing the defendant for focusing solely on exculpatory provision of contract to the exclusion of its specifically articulated obligations, noting that such an interpretation would render defendant’s contractual duties illusory
• individual terms must be construed to harmonize with contract as a whole

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).