Shore v. Andrews

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \a change in an attending physician's opinion concerning an employee's ability to resume work\ is sufficient to prove a change in condition
• holding that in the absence of any objective medical evidence of continued physiological abnormality, a physician’s opinion that the employee is able to resume unrestricted work qualifies as a change in condition
• change in condition is not limited to changes in employee’s -3- physical condition, but also allows consideration of change in attending physician’s opinion as to whether employee has ability to resume work
• statute .defined “change in condition” to mean “a change in physical condition of the employee as well as any change in the conditions under which compensation was awarded or terminated which would affect the right to, amount of, or duration of compensation”
• an attending physician’s opinion concerning an employee’s ability to resume work
• with unequivocal medical evidence that the claimant was fully able to return to unrestricted work and the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the commission could only conclude that the claimant was able to return to work, regardless of the placement of the burden of proof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).