Shope v. Swope

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the contractual “provisions made different guarantees to plan beneficiaries (such as the percentage of rebates to be paid to the plan rather than retained by [the PBM]) and therefore set forth distinct obligations on the part of [the PBM]”
• individual in one ERISA benefit plan may represent a class of participants in numerous other plans

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).